18.4.12

Albert Oehlen


Albert Oehlen   Untitled   2011


“We have to approach Oehlen's works gradually, step by step, as though ascending a staircase. We set out armed with the confidence of certainty, full of an unerring faith in the power of irony, streetwise to all the tricks of ridicule, only to find ourselves confronted with unreal forms and meaningless signs of glaring duplicity. Their sole objective seems to be to keep us alert and constantly on the lookout so that the whole painting can reveal itself for what it really is. The paintings have an information overload reminding the spectator that looking at the picture is likely to put him in the precarious position of having his eyes opened.”                                              
                                                                         Fabrice Hergott

Sigmar Polke


Sigmar Polke   Untitled   2006


“Darkness and light inextricably coexist, as social bonding coexists with aggression against the other. Everything is on its way to becoming something else. Everything we see is likely to be something other than what we think it is, or on its way to being seen as something other. We ourselves are always flowing out of ourselves, into the ozone of transcendence, into the cauldron of desire or the collective mystery of society. This whole exhibition, in fact, might be considered a succinct catalogue of the ways we get it wrong --an atlas of roads-to-hell well paved with good intentions -- an index of quick fictions that demonstrate the frailty of our aspirations to integrity and understanding. The gift these paintings make to us, then, is the vertiginous, anxious pleasure we derive from being freely lost, from not seeing anything clearly and not knowing anything for sure. In Polke's aesthetic, these anxious pleasures are the best we can expect from a world in which one pays too high a price for the comfort of certainty.”
                            Dave Hickey   from the catalogue Sigmar Polke: History of Everything


Nuala Gregory


Nuala Gregory   detail from Exploded View wall installation   2010


“Post-medium and post-conceptual theories of art suggest that painting is not so much dead as posthumous, enduring an unending afterlife. Its achievement is certain but insufficiently understood, and so it lingers on (as embarrassment, enigma, or happy commodity) in the digital age.”
  Nuala Gregory



9.1.12

Monet's Pond


Claude Monet   Water-Lily Pond   1926

“For the pond [in Monet’s garden] was as artificial as painting itself. It was flat, as a painting is. What showed on its surface, the clouds and lilypads and cat's-paws of wind, the dark patches of reflected foliage, the abysses of dark blue and the opaline shimmer of light from the sky, were all compressed together in a shallow space, a skin, like the space of painting. The willows touched it like brushes. No foreground, no background; instead, a web of connections. Monet's vision of energy manifesting itself in a continuous field of nuances would be of great importance to abstract painting thirty years after his death. A work like Jackson Pollock's Lavender Mist, 1950, with its palpitation of paint-skeins knitted across the whole canvas, is an American prolongation of the Symbolist line that runs through Monet's garden. But even if they had had no echoes in future painting, some of the Waterlilies would still be among the supreme moments of vision in Western art. The pond was a slice of infinity. To seize the indefinite; to fix what is unstable; to give form and location to sights so evanescent and complex that they could hardly be named -- these were basic ambitions of modernism, and they went against the smug view of determined reality that materialism and positivism give us."
                             
                                                     Robert Hughes   from The Shock of The New



7.1.12

Patrick Michael Fitzgerald


Patrick Michael Fitzgerald  Tree (andratx)   2009


“My working process is quite organic and I like the materiality and directness of painting. Each painting is a kind of entity or body; they are layered and grow in unexpected ways; they are meshed and woven together using different painterly components, small gestures and marks, threads and lines, swathes and bands. I like the idea of cultivation and gardens and the paintings often refer to these directly or indirectly. Obviously, colour, light and form are essential elements in my work but also the qualities of surface, tactility and touch are very important too. I have come to understand that painting is as much about energy as anything else, nothing is really solid and finally formed.”
                                                                Patrick Michael Fitzgerald    
 
 

Richard Rorty


Micky Donnelly  Untitled #4  2011  Oil on Fabric on Canvas


Richard Rorty, in his book ‘Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity', argues very persuasively that all vocabularies which purport to describe our world are contingent and therefore open to re-adjustment. He says that people who become aware of this contingency can be called ‘ironists’ in that they treat all ‘final’ (i.e. closed and conclusive) descriptions of the world with equal caution, no matter how solid and agreeable some appear to be.
In other words, every accepted description of our world -- religious, artistic, ideological, philosophical, and scientific -- is never completely trustworthy and is open to question.
An acceptance of Rorty’s position, which is itself contingent, activates all kinds of freedoms for us to continuously re-assess our most closely held values, and to reject, re-arrange, or at least challenge, our assumed hierarchies of meaning and our most ingrained notions of reality.


Amy Sillman


Amy Sillman   Bed   2006


“Painting is a physical thinking process to continue an interior dialogue, a way to engage in a kind of internal discourse, or sub-linguistic mumbling…”
                                                                   Amy Sillman


Dave Hickey


Micky Donnelly  Untitled #14  2011  Oil on Fabric on Wood

 
                                 “The meaning of a sign is the response to it.”
                                                                     Dave Hickey

Philip Guston


Philip Guston  Red Sea  1975


“The spatial dynamics of Guston's paintings are elemental and organic in their permutations. Usually the scene is set by a simple horizontal division of the canvas, each half dominated by a single hue—most often blue or black opposite red or roseate grays—and the resulting space is almost closed off by the density of pigment and color. Although Guston's paintings, like Rothko's late work, are frontal and expansive in design, their atmosphere is, by contrast, heavy and airless. Emphatically earth-bound, they instill claustrophobia rather than intimate transcen­dence. Their topography consists of barren embankments that press forward like landslides against the picture plane, encroaching upon the viewer's space while seeming to forbid any escape for the figures that languish half-embedded in them. Thus, Guston's work recalls the somber, denuded landscapes of Goya's Black Paintings.”
                                                                                                  Robert Storr